Back to the ledger

review.review — about

What they said. What actually happened. Side by side.

review.review is a public ledger of what powerful people publicly promised — and what actually happened. Sourced. Dated. In Phase 2, anchored to win.win, a decentralized public network, so the record can’t be deleted or quietly edited.

What it is

A public ledger of public promises.

review.review captures what powerful people publicly said — on social media, in speeches, in press conferences, in filings — and compares each claim against what actually happened. Every record is sourced, dated, and rendered identically.

Who it covers

Politics first, per country, per account.

Phase 1 starts with U.S. political figures across both parties, captured from X, Truth Social, Instagram, press conferences, and official speeches. Phase 2 widens country by country — United Kingdom, then EU. Phase 3 adds scams and public-company leadership.

How resolution works

Continuously, against reality.

A commitment does not get a one-shot verdict. As independent outcome data arrives — audits, rulings, government reports, reputable publications — the record is compared against reality and the status updated. Every revision is itself anchored and citeable.

Where records live

On win.win, a decentralized public network.

In Phase 2, review.review will publish a hash of every record to win.win. From that point on, the record cannot be altered or deleted after the fact — not by us, not by the subject, not by anyone else. The founders of win.win also initiated review.review; operation is independent.

What we do not do

We do not issue verdicts.

We record the claim, record the outcome, cite both, and let the reader compare. We are not fact-checkers, not a news organisation, not a prediction market, not an identity verifier. The structured source layer is designed to be upstream of all of them.