Back to the ledger

review.review — about

What they said. What actually happened. Side by side.

review.review is a public ledger of what powerful people publicly promised — and what actually happened. Sourced. Dated. In Phase 2, anchored to win.win, a decentralized public network, so the record can’t be deleted or quietly edited.

What it is

A public ledger of public promises.

review.review captures what powerful people publicly said — on social media, in speeches, in press conferences, in filings — and compares each claim against what actually happened. Every record is sourced, dated, and rendered identically.

Who it covers

Politics first, per country, per account.

Phase 1 starts with U.S. political figures across both parties, captured from X, Truth Social, Instagram, press conferences, and official speeches. Phase 2 widens country by country — United Kingdom, then EU. Phase 3 adds scams and public-company leadership.

How resolution works

Continuously, against reality.

A commitment does not get a one-shot answer. As independent outcome data arrives — audits, rulings, government reports, reputable publications — the record is compared against reality and the result updated. Every revision is itself anchored and citeable.

Where records live

On win.win, a decentralized public network.

In Phase 2, review.review will publish a hash of every record to win.win. From that point on, the record cannot be altered or deleted after the fact — not by us, not by the subject, not by anyone else. The founders of win.win also initiated review.review; operation is independent.

What we do not do

We do not issue verdicts.

We record the quote, record the outcome, compare the two, and publish the result — with both sources cited. The reader decides what to do with it. We are not fact-checkers, not a news organisation, not a prediction market, not an identity verifier. The structured source layer is designed to be upstream of all of them.

On the gull and the brand